Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

'Hong Kong people' could be a dangerous concept

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-11-07 07:41
Share
Share - WeChat

I happened to read my last piece in this column as it was printed, which I seldom do, and was surprised to find that the term I used, Hongkongers, was changed to "the Hong Kong people" throughout the piece.

I would like to clarify that I certainly did not mean to say "the Hong Kong people". I do not believe there is a "Hong Kong people" and I strongly oppose any suggestion that it exists.

"A people" is a political concept. It is a plurality of persons considered as a whole, as is the case with an ethnic group or nation. Collectively, for example, the contemporary Frisians and Danes are two related Germanic peoples, while various Middle Eastern ethnic groups are often linguistically categorized as Semitic peoples.

Various states govern, or claim to govern, in the name of the people. Both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire used the Latin term Senatus Populusque Romanus (the Senate and People of Rome). This term was fixed to Roman legionary standards, and even after the Roman emperors achieved a state of total personal autarchy, they continued to wield their power in the name of the Senate and People of Rome.

The claim that there is a Hong Kong people is dangerous. Article I of the United Nations Charter provides that: "All peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development." This right to self-determination is recognized as a right of all peoples in the first article common to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Our nation is called the People's Republic of China for a reason. It represents, and therefore presupposes, a Chinese people. Chinese, as a whole, are a people. As a people, we have the right to freely determine our political status and freely pursue our economic, social and cultural development. We value this right, but we have to be careful how we define "our people".

The first thing separatists do is to claim that they are a distinctive people, and that it is unjust to group their people together with others who happen to share the same piece of land. That's also what some people in Hong Kong are trying to do, although they are all Chinese and immigrants from outside of Hong Kong.

Hongkongers and the Hong Kong people are two different things. We can also call them people in Hong Kong, or Hong Kong residents. Likewise, there is no such thing as a Hong Kong citizen because many Hongkongers are nationals of foreign countries.

This confusion may have to do with our mistaken attempt to distance ourselves from the early years of our nation, a trend that President Xi Jinping has warned us against. As you can see, the word people has a political meaning from the first day it was born. The Chinese word for people is renmin, a Marxist-Maoist political concept that embodies both rights and responsibilities. If we remember that, we wouldn't be using the word people lightly.

The phrase "Hong Kong people" reinforces the concept that there exists a distinct ethnic group in Hong Kong, while terminology such as Hongkongers is less objectifying. Similarly, we would not call New Yorkers "the New York people", which just does not sound right.

Permanent residents of Hong Kong consist of different ethnic groups and people from around the world. There are Han-Chinese, Southeast Asians, Anglo-Saxons and many others. Many Hong Kong residents who are Chinese ethnically nonetheless are holders of non-PRC passports. Some were born and raised here, many were immigrants. Those permanent residents who are also Chinese nationals will eventually enjoy the same rights and responsibilities as with the other Chinese people, or renmin.

Words are powerful. They have the ability to summon reality into being. We must resist using words that will suggest things that do not exist. When others use them, we have to politely point out that they should not and state why.

(HK Edition 11/07/2017 page7)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 么公的又大又深又硬想要| 爆乳美女脱内衣18禁裸露网站| 樱桃视频高清免费观看在线播放| 国产女主播喷水视频在线观看| 亚洲乱码一区二区三区在线观看| 黄色永久免费网站| 成年女人免费碰碰视频| 亚洲黄色片一级| 3d动漫h在线观看| 无码一区二区三区| 伊人久久大香线蕉电影院| 奇米精品一区二区三区在| 日本免费一区二区三区最新| 免费播放特黄特色毛片| 91精品国产入口| 曰批免费视频试看天天视频下| 古月娜下面好紧好爽| 91久久国产情侣真实对白| 日韩国产成人精品视频| 全免费a级毛片免费看| 两个人看的www免费| 好男人官网在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕无码中文字在线| 色窝窝亚洲AV网在线观看| 在线观看亚洲免费视频| 久久精品无码精品免费专区| 秦老头大战秦丽娟无删节| 国产精品jvid在线观看| 中文字幕色婷婷在线视频| 波多野结衣bt| 国产剧情中文字幕| chinese中国农村夫tube| 日韩高清在线中文字带字幕| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码| 高清一区二区三区日本久| 好吊妞视频这里有精品| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看下载| 精品日韩在线视频| 国产精品无码a∨精品| 中文字幕av无码无卡免费| 欧美成人看片一区二区三区|