Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
China
Home / China / HK Macao

Ex-top judge: HK judiciary needs radical cultural change

By Gang Wen | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2020-09-03 17:24
Share
Share - WeChat
Fire erupts at the entrance of the High Court Building after rioters firebombed the courthouse on Dec 8, 2019.[Photo/CHINA DAILY]

HONG KONG - Henry Litton, a retired judge of Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal, said the city's judiciary needs deep soul-searching for the city's courts have helped create the social environment leading to the mayhem wrought on the streets over the past year.

In an opinion piece published in local English daily South China Morning Post on Thursday, Litton said local courts have, in many cases, subordinated the common good to the assertions of personal right, which gives a sense of personal sovereignty to those who have taken to the streets in violent protest.

"Laws which protect the majority can be trashed with impunity because personal agendas are supreme."

As one of the most breathtaking examples, Litton cited the court case in November 2019 concerning face-covering. Two High Court judges ruled the Emergency Regulations Ordinance, invoked to introduce the anti-mask law, was incompatible with the new "constitutional order" established after June 1997 for Hong Kong.

"This shows total insensitivity to the policy of one country, two systems," the veteran judge said.

He criticized the judges adjudicating the case for "elevating themselves to be on a par with the National People's Congress, deciding what the constitutional order for Hong Kong should be, thus empowering themselves to strike down an essential piece of primary legislation".

The final power of interpretation lies not with the Hong Kong courts but with Beijing, he pointed out.

But the courts, Litton noted, have allowed lawyers to "play forensic games", using articles in the Basic Law as "weapons to strike at government institutions".

And every time the High Court judges on the frontline of judicial review cases purport to apply the Basic Law, the act potentially makes a dent in Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy, Litton said.

He took note of the startling rise of over 34 times in the number of judicial review applications in 2019 since 1997. According to Litton, there were 3,889 applications for judicial review last year, up from 112 in 1997.

"Does this alone not suggest that the process has been abused?" he questioned.

Litton also criticized Hong Kong lawyers, especially the Hong Kong Bar Association, for having "an alarming blindness" to realities on the ground. The repeated statements by the association come with "an unspoken agenda", in Litton's opinion, which is that a "high degree of autonomy" means that the central government has no sovereign powers over Hong Kong.

Worst of all, the courts in the city have played along with their agenda and allowed counsel to "turn the Basic Law on its head: instead of it being the guarantee of Hong Kong's stability and prosperity, it has been used to chisel away the edifices of law and order", he wrote.

He asked whether one can honestly say the common law system in Hong Kong, once a robust and effective common law system in 1997, is "fit for purpose".

He advised the judiciary to adopt a shift in mindset as it needs radical cultural change to "render the system fit for purpose again" and to "re-energize the common law and make it relevant to Hong Kong's circumstances".

"What is plain is that Beijing has not deviated from the course set for Hong Kong. The 'one country, two systems' policy is intact. And the Basic Law gives substance to that policy," Litton said.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 全黄性性激高免费视频| 国产高清www免费视频| 亚洲av永久无码精品天堂久久| 精品国产人成亚洲区| 国产成人午夜性a一级毛片| 99久久精品美女高潮喷水| 成年美女黄网站色大片免费看| 亚洲AV无码精品色午夜果冻不卡| 狂野猛交xxxx吃奶| 囯产精品一品二区三区| 国产精品你懂得| 国产美女精品久久久久久久免费| 一道本在线观看视频| 日本高清不卡在线观看| 亚洲国产av无码精品| 狼群影院www| 欧美肥老太肥506070| 四虎精品在线视频| 麻豆精品一区二区综合av| 国产精品深夜福利免费观看| japanesexxxxhd熟睡直播| 我的巨ru麻麻奶水喷| 久久精品国产精品亚洲精品| 欧美日本高清在线不卡区| 伊人久久精品一区二区三区| 美美女高清毛片视频免费观看 | juy639黑人教练君岛美绪| 日产精品99久久久久久| 九九精品国产亚洲AV日韩| 欧美日韩在大午夜爽爽影院| 你看桌子上都是你流的| 精品国产高清自在线一区二区三区| 国产乱人伦AV在线麻豆A| 成人在线观看不卡| 国产精品亚洲а∨无码播放麻豆| 99国内精品久久久久久久| 学校触犯×ofthedead| 中文字幕亚洲乱码熟女一区二区| 日本高清免费不卡在线播放| 亚洲av永久精品爱情岛论坛| 欧美日本国产VA高清CABAL|