Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Diplomacy

China issues report on US' democracy

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2021-12-05 11:03
Share
Share - WeChat

(5) "Freedom of speech" in name only

In the US, the media?is?juxtaposed with the executive, the legislative and the judiciary as the "fourth branch of government" and journalists are considered?"uncrowned kings". Though US media organizations claim?to be?independent from politics and serve freedom and truth, they?are actually serving financial interests?and party politics.

A?few media conglomerates?maintain control of the US news?media?and have?morphed?into?a?political force with outsize influence.

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the federal government is required?to relax regulation over the ownership of media?outlets. This has led to?an unprecedented wave of mergers?and?a crippling erosion of the diversity and independence of the US media. The drastic?reduction in the number of media outlets has?enabled a few companies to expand into monopolies.

In the US, a few media conglomerates are?now?in control of over 90% of media outlets, netting?them an annual profit even higher than the gross domestic product (GDP) of some developing countries.

These media behemoths, while eager to make more?business footprints, have extended?their reach?into American politics, attempting to sway political processes through lobbying, public relations campaign or political donations.

The?US?media?monopolies?have?become "invisible killers"?of civil and political rights.

Robert McChesney, a leading US scholar?in?the studies of political economy of communications and?professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, notes?in his book Rich Media, Poor Democracy?that media companies, profit-driven by nature, confine people to the world of entertainment?programs, depriving their access to diversified information, distracting their interest in public affairs,?diminishing their ability to?distinguish between right and?wrong,?and muting their voice in the decision-making of social policies.?In an American society dominated by media narratives, traditional notions of civic and political involvement have shriveled. Depoliticization has turned democracy into a political game without citizens.

A report in Miami's New Herald?argues?that?as?the media is controlled by?the?elite and conglomerates, people are not able to distinguish between facts?and?political propaganda.

The US media?is no longer?a "gatekeeper" of democracy. The?political wrangling?between the Left?and Right in the US media?has further?entrenched the estrangement and division between the?two?parties and between the elite and the mass public.?It has aggravated?political polarization?in the US, pushing the political Left further left and the Right further right. And it has fueled the spread of extremist ideologies?and?populism in the US.

According to a study by?Sejong Institute, a think tank in the Republic of Korea, over 80% of conservative voters in the US see news?reports by mainstream media outlets, such as New York Times,?as false information and have a biased trust in media.?Voters believe?in only a few media?outlets and would ignore communications at the national?level. Levelheaded?discussions and consensus-building have been replaced by megaphone politics and negative partisan strife.

The Digital News Report?2021?issued?by the University of Oxford and Reuters Institute indicates that?among 92,000 online news consumers?surveyed in 46 markets, those in the US have the lowest level of trust in?news, a mere?29%.

In the information age when?traditional media is on the decline, social media has become a new?favorite?for the general public. Yet,?like traditional media, social media?is also under the control of big capital and interest groups. To increase their website traffic, social media sites use algorithms to create "information cocoons", leaving extreme content unchecked and uncontrolled. This drives users toward self-reinforcing their existing views, exacerbates identity politics, and further divides public opinion.

In October 2021, former Facebook employee Frances Haugen leaked tens of thousands of pages of explosive internal documents of Facebook. She disclosed to Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) that Facebook would not hesitate to sacrifice public interests to keep users on its platform and make profits. Facebook has become a main platform for social extremists and is fraught with hate speech, disinformation and misinformation. Action is only taken on?3-5% of hate and about 0.6% of violence and incitement on the platform.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩亚洲人成在线综合| 国产专区第一页| 亚洲美女又黄又爽在线观看| 三人交bangbangbang| 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天古典 | 色综合久久天天综合绕观看| 女人战争免费观看韩国| 亚洲乱亚洲乱妇无码麻豆| 精品综合久久久久久蜜月| 国内精品videofree720| 久久久久亚洲AV无码去区首| 特级欧美老少乱配| 国产成人8X视频网站入口| 一级做a爰全过程完整版电影播放| 欧美在线观看视频网站| 国产123在线观看| 15一16毛片女人| 性XXXXBBBBXXXXX国产| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区鸳鸯影院 | 黑人巨大精品大战白人美女| 好大好湿好硬顶到了好爽视频| 乱人伦视频中文字幕| 男女性潮高清免费网站| 国产女主播喷水视频在线观看| AV无码久久久久不卡网站下载| 日本护士handjob| 亚洲精品欧美综合四区| 荡货把腿给我打开视频| 国精产品一区一区三区有限公司| 久久久久国产成人精品| 欧美日韩一区二区三区自拍| 四虎成人精品国产永久免费无码| 制服丝袜一区在线| 妞干网免费观看视频| 久久国产精品老人性| 欧美日韩视频在线| 北条麻妃毛片在线视频| 黄页网站在线免费观看| 国产欧美一区二区精品久久久| 99久久国语露脸精品国产| 扒开双腿猛进入免费观看美女 |