US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Opinion

Reduce inequality to sustain economic growth

By Vinod Thomas (China Daily) Updated: 2014-03-31 10:32

Three decades of high economic growth in China have served to lift millions of people out of poverty. But, at the same time, the gap between the rich and the poor has widened sharply, threatening welfare, social stability, and growth itself. Tackling inequality, therefore, is rightly at the top of the country's policy agenda.

A natural policy response to the emerging inequality is to try to include all the people in the economic agenda, which, in turn, would expand the possibilities for growth. This greater inclusion would also strengthen the impact growth has on reducing poverty. In China, improving the relative standing of the poor, who need to boost basic consumption, would also aid the government's objective of increasing domestic demand.

An indication of such inclusion is provided by a measure of income distribution. While income in Asia has historically been relatively egalitarian, it has grown increasingly unequal over the last two decades. The Gini coefficient for developing Asia increased from 39 in the mid-1990s to 46 in the late 2000s (zero represents complete equality and 100 complete inequality). In China, the Gini rose from below 30 in the 1970s to over 47 in recent years.

China must also grapple with the great income divide separating richer urban areas from the rural. Income levels are also substantially higher in the eastern coastal regions compared with the western parts. Cost of living is typically lower in the rural and poorer areas but, even accounting for it, the real gaps are vast.

Inequality is partly rooted in economic globalization, over which an individual country has little control. For example, in the global setting we see rising returns on capital and an increasing premium paid for higher skills for some people, even in countries where low-skilled labor is abundant. Also, technological change has created winner-take-all contests for incomes. Reflecting these trends, the return on capital relative to labor in manufacturing output is estimated to have risen notably between the mid-1990s and the mid-2000s in China and India.

Meanwhile, countries can control other sources of inequality. One issue relates to disparities in education. In some Asian countries, school-age children from households in the poorest income quintile are three to five times more likely to be out of primary and secondary school as those in the richest quintile. Actions to improve access for the poor to education will help. Efforts also need to focus on improving quality and ensuring through education that labor-force skills are a better match for labor market needs.

Yet, government spending on education and health as a share of gross domestic product in Asia is generally lower than comparable regions, and relatively low in China compared with other upper-middle-income countries. Governments, by increasing spending on education, health, social protection and better pension schemes, could free funds among poorer households for greater consumption.

Another area ripe for improvement involves sectors with high labor intensity, such as agriculture. We have seen a secular decline in agricultural investments and productivity in most regions of the world, the negative impact of which was heightened in recent years with the rise in food prices. Countries and international financial institutions recognize the decline in agricultural investments that this has helped bring about should be reversed.

Improving agricultural productivity and efficiency cannot only help the rural poor by increasing their incomes, but also the urban poor by lowering food prices. The urban share of the population in China has surged, from less than 35 percent in 2000 to 50 percent in 2010. Greater attention to agriculture and rural development can improve the quality of urbanization.

Yet another consideration is that the State needs to deliver services better. China, India, Indonesia and the Philippines are working to improve organizational structures to provide better social services, while combating corruption. In doing so, they also need to ensure that they match the current trend for decentralization of public service provision with adequate fiscal resources, including for transfers to lower-level governments. In China, governments below the provincial level now account for more than half of public expenditure. Decentralization has left many poor villages unable to afford them.

Finally, governments need to boost fiscal space to promote greater inclusion, which would involve measures that expand the tax base, boost the formal sector of the economy, improve tax administration and curtail tax evasion.

The author is director-general, independent evaluation at the Asian Development Bank in Manila. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Reduce inequality to sustain economic growth

Top 10 figures in 2014 govt work report?

Reduce inequality to sustain economic growth

Experts: GDP growth target reasonable?

 

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美疯狂性受xxxxx另类| 久久精品人人槡人妻人人玩| 蜜臀AV在线播放一区二区三区 | 人人妻人人澡人人爽不卡视频| 免费无码一区二区三区| 四虎影视久久久免费| 内射白浆一区二区在线观看 | 国产精品成人一区二区三区| 国产猛男猛女超爽免费视频| 国产成人亚洲综合| 四虎影视在线影院4hutv| 国产一级片免费看| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮| 亚洲第一成年免费网站| 国产成人精品日本亚洲专区6| 色噜噜狠狠色综合日日| 精品久久久久久久久中文字幕| 波多野结衣巨女教师6| 欧美一级在线播放| 日日噜噜夜夜爽爽| 天堂√在线中文资源网| 国产日韩综合一区二区性色av| 国产av午夜精品一区二区入口| 人成免费在线视频| 亚洲2022国产成人精品无码区 | 啊灬啊灬啊灬快好深在线观看| 人文艺术欣赏ppt404| 亚州1区2区3区4区产品乱码2021 | 免费看美女扒开腿让男人桶| 亚洲国产精品xo在线观看| 久久久精品波多野结衣| 三级波多野结衣护士三级| 一级性生活免费| bt天堂新版中文在线地址| heyzo北条麻妃久久| www.jizz在线观看| 免费黄色网址网站| 综合欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 成人福利视频app| 无码精品一区二区三区免费视频| 好男人社区www在线观看高清|