US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / View

Central banks lemmings of quantitative easing

By STEPHEN ROACH (China Daily) Updated: 2015-01-29 13:23

Central banks lemmings of quantitative easing

CAI MENG/CHINA DAILY

Predictably, the European Central Bank has joined the world's other major monetary authorities in the greatest experiment in the history of central banking. By now, the pattern is all too familiar. First, central banks take the conventional policy rate down to the dreaded "zero bound". Facing continued economic weakness, but having run out of conventional tools, they then embrace the unconventional approach of quantitative easing (QE).

The theory behind this strategy is simple: Unable to cut the price of credit further, central banks shift their focus to expanding its quantity. The implicit argument is that this move from price to quantity adjustments is the functional equivalent of additional monetary policy easing. Thus, even at the zero bound of nominal interest rates, it is argued, central banks still have weapons in their arsenal.

But are those weapons up to the task? For the ECB and the Bank of Japan, both of which are facing formidable downside risks to their economies and aggregate price levels, this is hardly an idle question. For the United States, where the ultimate consequences of QE remain to be seen, the answer is just as consequential.

In terms of transmission, the US Federal Reserve has focused on the so-called wealth effect. First, the balance sheet expansion of some $3.6 trillion since late 2008-which far exceeded the $2.5 trillion in nominal GDP growth over the QE period-boosted asset markets. It was assumed that the improvement in investors' portfolio performance-reflected in a more than threefold rise in the S&P 500 from its crisis-induced low in March 2009-would spur a burst of spending by increasingly wealthy consumers. The BOJ has used a similar justification for its own policy of quantitative and qualitative easing (QQE).

The ECB, however, will have a harder time making the case for wealth effects, largely because equity ownership by individuals (either direct or through their pension accounts) is far lower in Europe than in the US or Japan. For Europe, monetary policy seems more likely to be transmitted through banks, as well as through the currency channel, as a weaker euro-it has fallen some 15 percent against the US dollar over the last year-boosts exports.

The real sticking point for QE relates to traction. The US, where consumption accounts for the bulk of the shortfall in the post-crisis recovery, is a case in point. In an environment of excess debt and inadequate savings, wealth effects have done very little to ameliorate the balance sheet recession that clobbered US households when the property and credit bubbles burst. Indeed, annualized real consumption growth has averaged just 1.3 percent since early 2008. With the current recovery in real GDP on a trajectory of 2.3 percent annual growth-2 percentage points below the norm of past cycles-it is tough to justify the widespread praise of QE.

Japan's massive QQE campaign has faced similar traction problems. After expanding its balance sheet to nearly 60 percent of GDP-double the size of the Fed's-the BOJ is finding that its campaign to end deflation is increasingly ineffective. Japan has lapsed back into recession, and the BOJ has just cut the inflation target for this year from 1.7 percent to 1 percent.

Finally, QE also disappoints in terms of time consistency. The Fed has long qualified its post-QE normalization strategy with a host of data-dependent conditions pertaining to the state of the economy and/or inflation risks. Moreover, it is now relying on ambiguous adjectives to provide guidance to financial markets, having recently shifted from stating that it would maintain low rates for a "considerable" time to pledging to be "patient" in determining when to raise rates.

In the QE era, monetary policy has lost any semblance of discipline and coherence. As ECB President Mario Draghi attempts to deliver on his nearly two-and-a-half-year-old commitment, the limits of his promise-like comparable assurances by the Fed and the BOJ-could become glaringly apparent. Like lemmings at the cliff's edge, central banks seem steeped in denial of the risks they face.

The author is a faculty member at Yale University and former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia. Project Syndicate

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 男生女生一起差差差带疼痛| 99精品在线看| 杨玉环三级dvd| 亚洲精品无码久久久久YW| 美女把腿扒开让男人桶免费| 国产好痛疼轻点好爽的视频| 91w乳液78w78wyw5| 天天操天天干视频| 中文字幕一区日韩精品| 日韩在线观看中文字幕| 亚洲区小说区图片区qvod| 波多野结衣被绝伦在线观看 | 2020国语对白露脸| 在线观看网站黄| www性久久久com| 性无码专区无码| 丽玲老师高跟鞋调教小说| 日本黄色一级大片| 久久综合色88| 桃花阁成人网在线观看| 亚洲成A人片在线观看无码3D| 热99re久久精品精品免费| 免费在线黄网站| 精品无码久久久久久国产| 四虎高清成人永久免费影院| 色综合久久久久久久久久| 国产人成视频在线视频| 高清中文字幕视频在线播| 国产成人青青热久免费精品| 天天影视色香欲综合免费| 国产精品亚洲一区二区无码| 2022国产成人精品视频人| 国产美女牲交视频| 91短视频网站| 国产麻豆videoxxxx实拍| 97色伦综合在线欧美视频| 国邦征服雪婷第二篇| 99久久精品免费看国产一区二区三区 | 玩弄丰满少妇人妻视频| 免费人成视频在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久亚洲|