US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
China / Society

Forced prostitution case heard again

By WEN XINZHENG in Changsha and CAO YIN in Beijing (chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2014-07-25 21:18

A high-profile case in which two men are accused of forcing a girl in Hunan province into prostitution was heard in a retrial on Friday by the provincial high people’s court.

The new trial was ordered by the Supreme People’s Court, which rejected the death penalty in the case in June.

Qin Xing and Zhou Junhui, the accused, both of Yongzhou, were sentenced to death for organizing prostitution and forcing the then-11-year-old girl to engage in sex acts, according to the first-instance verdict from the Yongzhou Intermediate People’s Court in 2008.

The case was retried twice, while the provincial high people’s court upheld, in 2012, the original verdict of death for the two men.

However, China’s top court said in its statement issued on June 5 that the sentences were not reasonable as the men’s behavior did not reach the “most serious” line defined in the current criminal law. It sent the case back to the provincial high people’s court for retrial.

Xu Tianqiao, Qin’s lawyer, said during the Friday trial that his client stopped a fellow inmate, Zhou Lanlan, from committing suicide in the prison, which should be identified a meritorious deed under the law.

“Because of this, Qin should be given a lighter sentence,” Xu said, though the court did not accept the argument.

It did not render a judgment at the end of the trial.

Tang Hui, the girl’s mother, said after the hearing that she does not know what new sentence will be given to the two men, “but in my eyes, they deserved harsher punishment for their damage to my girl”.

The case received wide attention in part because Tang was ordered — unjustly, in the eyes of many — to serve 18-months in laojiao, or re-education through labor, in 2012 for repeatedly petitioning local authorities about the case.

Then 40 years old, she was released within a week after her story triggered a storm of public outrage, and she applied for State compensation.

Tang failed to get any compensation. She then sued the Yongzhou laojiao administrative committee at the local court and won the case in July.

Highlights
Hot Topics
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲av成人片在线观看| 美女扒开大腿让男人桶| 美女脱精光给男生摸| 波多野结大战三个黑鬼| 日韩免费电影在线观看| 精品国产午夜肉伦伦影院| 牛牛本精品99久久精品| 日韩不卡手机视频在线观看| 日本不卡在线观看免费v| 在线观看国产一区二区三区| 在线观看污视频网站| 国产午夜精品久久久久免费视| 伊人激情久久综合中文字幕| 久久综合九色综合网站| 久久受www免费人成_看片中文| 久久亚洲美女精品国产精品| 99re这里有免费视频精品| 100部毛片免费全部播放完整| 色婷五月综激情亚洲综合| 精品一区二区三区在线视频| 日韩精品成人一区二区三区 | 最新版天堂中文在线| 无限看片在线版免费视频大全| 国产高清在线精品免费软件| 国产放荡对白视频在线观看| 亚洲黄色一级毛片| 亚洲va久久久噜噜噜久久| 久久无码人妻一区二区三区| 91在线老师啪国自产| 老师好大好爽办公室视频| 18分钟处破好疼高清视频| 日本尤物精品视频在线看| 91成人精品视频| 精品综合久久久久久98| 日韩精品无码人妻一区二区三区| 国产高清自产拍av在线| 午夜精品久久久久久| 亚洲欧洲精品成人久久曰影片| 一级做a爰性色毛片免费| 超清首页国产亚洲丝袜| 精品国产免费一区二区三区|