.contact us |.about us
Home BizChina Newsphoto Cartoon LanguageTips Metrolife DragonKids SMS Edu
news... ...
             Focus on... ...
   

Cheney presses case for Iraq action
( 2002-08-27 09:14 ) (7 )

Vice President Dick Cheney warned Monday that the United States could face devastating consequences from any delay in acting to remove Saddam Hussein as president of Iraq.

Lawmakers urged President Bush to get their support before any invasion, even though White House advisers say congressional assent is not legally required.

Cheney's remarks were among the strongest by a high administration official about the urgency of ousting Saddam, spoken even as the White House contends no decision has been made to invade Iraq.

Speaking at a Veterans of Foreign Wars convention in Nashville, Tenn., Cheney dismissed what he called "deeply flawed" logic of people who argue against a pre-emptive strike to stop Saddam from developing chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.

"What we must not do in the face of a mortal threat is to give in to wishful thinking or willful blindness," he said. "We will not simply look away, hope for the best and leave the matter for some future administration to resolve."

Cheney pressed the administration's case for invading Iraq in face of growing misgivings about the potential loss of lives; the cost to U.S. taxpayers; the effects on other countries, friend and foe; and uncertainty about who would replace Saddam and how long the U.S. commitment would last. Many of the admonitions for caution have come from Republican lawmakers and officials of former GOP administrations.

"If this is a noble cause, and it's in the interest of our country, then the president needs to make the case," said Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., a member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

He said Bush should seek Congress' backing before ordering an invasion of Iraq, regardless of whether it's required. "If the president is going to commit this nation to war," Hagel said, "he'd better have the support of the Congress and the American people with him."

"The president has to get congressional approval," said House Democratic leader Dick Gephardt of Missouri. "He must have a debate on this issue and a vote in the Congress."

Gephardt spoke during a campaign appearance in Waterbury, Conn., on behalf of U.S. Rep. Jim Maloney, D-Conn.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said the decision of going to war "should not be treated like a technicality."

"For the good of the country and for the long-term success of whatever approach we take, President Bush should follow his father's lead and support a vigorous and constructive debate on Iraq," he said through a spokesman. Bush's father sought and received congressional backing before the 1991 Persian Gulf War.

The Republican chairman of the House International Relations Committee, Henry Hyde of Illinois, said he agreed with Gonzales, "but I also believe that any policy undertaken by the president without a popular mandate from Congress risks its long-term success." he said in a statement.

"Congress ultimately controls the government's budget, and the president should seek the active involvement of Congress in developing his policy."

In Crawford, Texas, where Bush is vacationing, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said White House counsel Al Gonzales advised Bush he does not need congressional authority to go to war with Iraq. Nevertheless, Fleischer said: "The president will consult with the Congress, because Congress has an important role to play."

In his Tennessee speech, Cheney delivered perhaps the administration's most comprehensive argument to date for ousting Saddam, although Bush and his advisers already had made most of the points he offered.

Failing to attack now will only allow Iraq to grow stronger, Cheney said. Forcing Saddam from power would bring freedom to Iraq, peace to the region, boost Arab moderates, cause extremists to rethink violence and help the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, he averred.

Those who say Iraq should be attacked only if Saddam develops a nuclear weapon later would argue, "We cannot because he has a nuclear weapon," Cheney said. That would lead to "a course of inaction that itself could have devastating consequences for many countries, including our own," he said.

The comments reflect growing unease within the White House: Aides acknowledge that Bush's critics are getting the upper hand because he can't make his case for ousting Saddam until he decides when and how to do it.

Congress has just begun exploring whether the United States should attack Iraq. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held two days of hearings before the August break, and more hearings are expected in the fall in both the House and Senate.

Lawmakers have circulated letters and offered resolutions calling on Bush to seek congressional authorization before attacking Iraq.

If invoked, the War Powers Act, passed in 1973 late in the Vietnam War, would prohibit the president from waging war for more than 60 days without congressional approval or a declaration of war by Congress.

 
   
 
   

 

         
         
       
        .contact us |.about us
  Copyright By chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved  
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲av丰满熟妇在线播放| 国产乱理伦片a级在线观看| japanesexxxx乱子老少配另类| 日本免费精品一区二区三区 | 全免费毛片在线播放| 在线观看网址入口2020国产| 三级黄在线播放| 日日橹狠狠爱欧美超碰| 久久狠狠高潮亚洲精品| 欧洲美女与动zooz| 亚洲成a人片77777老司机| 波多野结衣系列痴女| 免费中文字幕乱码电影麻豆网| 美女扒开尿口给男人桶视频免费 | 午夜免费1000部| 欧洲mv日韩mv国产| 亚洲第一页在线播放| 男人肌肌桶女肌肌网站| 免费观看美女用震蛋喷水的视频| 色综合色综合久久综合频道| 国产大片免费天天看| 国产精品h在线观看| 国产真实夫妇交换| 第一福利在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国快看| 717午夜伦伦电影理论片| 国内精品久久久久久久97牛牛| av片在线观看永久免费| 天天天天做夜夜夜做| hd日本扒衣党视频播放| 太粗太长岳受不了了| ljr绿巨人地址| 夫妇交换3中文字幕| japanesehd奶水哺乳期| 女仆的味道hd中字在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区| 少妇被又大又粗又爽毛片久久黑人 | bt自拍另类综合欧美| 女人扒开腿让男生桶爽动漫| www成人免费视频| 女人十八黄毛片|