Home>News Center>China
       
 

People offer pros & cons over Beijing Zoo's removal
(China Daily)
Updated: 2004-06-10 22:30

Talk that the Beijing Zoo, located in downtown Beijing and built almost a century ago, may be moved 35 kilometres away to the outskirts has aroused heated discussion.

"The Beijing Zoo has become a part of Beijing residents' ordinary life, so whether to move it or not is a topic connected to the public interest and must be discussed," said Lei Yi, a researcher with the Institute of Modern History of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

The zoo, one of China's largest with tens of thousands of animals living in it, was built in 1906 in the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) as China's first public zoo.

Early this year, Guo Baodong, deputy to the Beijing Municipal People's Congress, and Chen Ruijun, member of the CPPCC (Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference) Beijing Municipal Committee, made a proposal to move the Beijing Zoo from the inner city to the outskirts.

The current location of the zoo can cause cross-infections between humans and animals, pollute the urban environment and cause traffic jams, the proposal said adding that if it is moved to the suburbs where land prices are cheaper, animals will enjoy wider living spaces.

Relevant municipal departments have asked the Beijing Engineering Consulting Company to organize experts for further consultations and debate, said Wang Fenglin, chief economist of the company.

Experts have reached consensus that whether the zoo is moved or not, the vegetation that has existed for a century will not vanish and a good educational base will not be lost, Wang said.

It is unnecessary for the public to worry, Wang said.

But the public is worrying.

Lei Yi questioned the true incentive for the move, saying that the public has the right to know who will use the land where the zoo is currently located and for what purposes.

Chen Yueqin, the mother of a three-year-old child, is a lawyer working at a Beijing-based law firm. She said she usually takes her child to the zoo once or twice a month, but if the zoo is moved to the outskirts, it will be much more difficult for them to go there.

"The removal of the zoo ignores the right of the public to participate in decision making," she said.

If the zoo is moved out of the inner city, its function to educate will be weakened, said Wu Qing, deputy to the Beijing Municipal People's Congress. "So I firmly object to the zoo removal."

It is not convenient for the youngsters to go to the outskirts, so the removal of the zoo will make it more difficult for them to see animals, said Meng Zhaozhen, academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering.

 
  Today's Top News     Top China News
 

Eleven Chinese workers killed in Afghan attack

 

   
 

Japan sending chemists to analyze bombs

 

   
 

Pandas gift people with more births

 

   
 

Industries cool down growth

 

   
 

Volkswagen sides with 2008 Games

 

   
 

State bank splits up in pilot reform

 

   
  State bank splits up in pilot reform
   
  Chinese automaker to set up plant in Indonesia
   
  Chinese FM to attend Reagan funeral
   
  Lottery scandal lands six officials in jail
   
  Beijingers rally around Olympic relay
   
  Nation hails new Iraq resolution
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  When will china have direct elections?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品日韩二区三区精品视频| 亚洲一区二区观看播放| 77777亚洲午夜久久多喷| 最近2019免费中文字幕视频三 | 日韩a级无码免费视频| 免费污片在线观看| 亚洲国产成人va在线观看| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽不卡| 亚洲视频免费一区| 综合激情网五月| 国产精品国语自产拍在线观看| 中文精品北条麻妃中文| 欧美精欧美乱码一二三四区| 国产丫丫视频私人影院| 91热久久免费精品99| 日日噜噜噜夜夜爽爽狠狠视频| 亚洲av午夜福利精品一区| 精品一区二区三区东京热| 国产a级黄色毛片| 香蕉视频成人在线观看| 在线观看国产人视频免费中国| а天堂中文最新版在线| 把她抵在洗手台挺进撞击视频| 久久国产精品99久久久久久牛牛 | 爽爽影院在线看| 免费高清资源黄网站在线观看| 美女美女高清毛片视频| 国产一区二区福利久久| 野花香高清在线观看视频播放免费 | 一区二区三区高清视频在线观看 | 久久国产精品一国产精品金尊| 91香蕉在线视频| 小宝贝浪货摸给我看| 久久综合九色综合欧美狠狠| 潘多拉铂金刊33刊无圣光| 国产乱女乱子视频在线播放| 777国产偷窥盗摄精品品在线| 天天干天天爱天天操| 一级午夜a毛片免费视频| 性色AV一区二区三区夜夜嗨| 九九视频在线观看视频23|