March 20, 2025
    Advanced Search 
  Home>News Center>World
         
 

UK's Blair challenged to tally Iraq war dead
(Agencies)
Updated: 2004-12-08 14:52

British diplomats and peers joined scientists and churchmen on Wednesday to urge Prime Minister Tony Blair to publish a death toll in the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

In an unusual open letter to the premier made available to Reuters, the 44 signatories said Blair had rejected other death counts from the war -- figures span 14,000 to 100,000 -- without releasing one of his own.

Any totaling of the Iraqi war dead could embarrass Blair ahead of a general election expected in months in a country that opposed the U.S.-led war.

The group urged Blair to commission an urgent probe into the number of dead and injured and keep counting so long as British soldiers remain in Iraq alongside their American allies.

"Your government is obliged under international humanitarian law to protect the civilian population during military operations in Iraq, and you have consistently promised to do so," they wrote in the letter to be published on Wednesday.

"However, without counting the dead and injured, no one can know whether Britain and its coalition partners are meeting these obligations."

The inquiry, they added, should be independent of government, conducted according to accepted scientific methods and subjected to peer review.

Signatories included Air Marshal Sir Timothy Garden, who spent 32 years in the military; Sir Stephen Egerton, a former British ambassador to Iraq; human rights campaigner Bianca Jagger and the Lord Bishop of Coventry, Colin Bennetts.

Britain and the United States have suffered around 1,070 losses in the war so far. The Iraq-wide casualty count is not known, and a high tally could wreak political damage in Britain, where Blair is expected to win a 2005 election but with a reduced majority.

HOW MANY DEAD?

The writers, also including philosophers and lawyers, said their letter reflects "an influential and growing body of opinion that the government's failure to provide estimates of Iraqi casualties is unacceptable."

Former Foreign Office legal adviser Elizabeth Wilmshurst signed up, along with Iqbal Sacranie, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, writer Gillian Slovo and experts in public health.

The toll of the 20-month U.S.-led war is highly contentious.

In a report released in October by the Lancet medical journal, days before the U.S. election that returned President Bush to power, a group of American scientists put civilian deaths at 100,000.

But the Iraq Body Count (IBC) -- an Anglo-American research group tracking civilian deaths via numerous sources -- has come up with a much lower toll of about 14,000-16,000.

The IBC has now joined forces with Medact, a charity that says the war has crippled Iraq's medical system, to launch a new campaign challenging the government to publish casualties.

"No figures in a war zone are going to be perfect -- but that's no excuse for not trying," said John Sloboda, IBC co-founder.

Medact director Mike Rowson said: "Without information, everyone is working in the dark. The overstretched Iraqi health system should not be left to do this job alone. Britain and its coalition partners have a responsibility."



 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

Lenovo buys IBM's PC unit for $1.25 billion

 

   
 

Prices take largest jump since 1997

 

   
 

VW opens new auto venture with FAW

 

   
 

EU to send 'positive' signal on arms ban

 

   
 

Views on filial piety see change

 

   
 

Death, 'rape' case of teacher in spotlight

 

   
  Report: Egypt brokers Mideast peace plan
   
  Iraq rips neighbors on insurgency
   
  US to court martial GI in Iraq murder case
   
  Workers threatened over Iraq prison abuse
   
  Ukraine president, assembly deadlocked over poll
   
  House approves US intelligence overhaul
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
 
Font Large Medium Small
E-Mail This Story
Print Friendly Format
Comment On This Story
Save This Story
 
  News Talk  
  Are the Republicans exploiting the memory of 9/11?  
Advertisement
         

| Home | News | Business | Living in China | Forum | E-Papers | Weather |

| About China Daily | About China Daily.com.cn | Contact Us | Site Map | Jobs |
 Copyright 2005 Chinadaily.com.cn All rights reserved. Registered Number: 20100000002731
主站蜘蛛池模板: 黄网站在线观看| mm1313亚洲精品国产| 欧美乱妇高清无乱码在线观看| 免费网站看V片在线18禁无码| 视频免费1区二区三区| 国产日韩综合一区二区性色AV| 4虎2022年最新| 坤廷play水管| yellow版字幕网| 成人免费午间影院在线观看| 久久99精品国产麻豆不卡| 日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲av无码一区二区乱子伦as| 永久域名在线观看视频| 你是我的女人中文字幕高清| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| 国产乱码卡一卡2卡三卡四| 黄色一级片在线看| 国产无套粉嫩白浆| youjizz欧美| 欧美黄色免费看| 在线观看欧美国产| 一本色道无码道在线观看| 我和娇妻乱荡史| 中文字日本乱码| 花季视传媒app下载| 国产成人av三级在线观看| 日本成本人视频| 好吊操视频在线| 东北女人奶大毛多水多| 无码国模国产在线观看| 久久人午夜亚洲精品无码区| 日韩电影手机在线观看| 五月婷婷在线播放| 最近中文字幕在线mv视频7| 亚洲va久久久噜噜噜久久男同| 欧美性xxxx极品高清| 亚洲国产美女精品久久久久| 欧美成人精品一区二三区在线观看 | 影音先锋男人站| 中国帅男同chinese69|