Japan to export arms for missile shield (Agencies) Updated: 2004-12-10 15:55
Japan has taken another step away from its post-World War II pacifism with
the ending of its decades-old ban on military exports and telling defense
planners to regard China and North Korea as potential threats.
![Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. Japan has approved an overhaul of its military policy to allow defense exports to the United States. [AFP]](xin_151201101558886284639.jpg) Japanese Prime
Minister Junichiro Koizumi. Japan has approved an overhaul of its military
policy to allow defense exports to the United States.
[AFP] | Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's cabinet agreed to allow military sales --
only to the United States and for missile defense -- a day after it extended
Japan's ground-breaking troop deployment in Iraq or another year.
The policy change Friday came in the form of a set of guidelines for defense
policymakers, updated for the first time in nine years, along with a five-year
outline for military procurements set to begin from April 2005.
The guidelines approved by the cabinet said Japan needed to change its
mindset to have "multi-function, flexible defense capabilities" to deal with new
threats such as terrorist and missile attacks.
A statement by Chief Cabinet Secretary Hiroyuki Hosoda said Japan decided to
export missile parts to the United States under "strict controls" to contribute
to "the Japan-US security alliance and secure the safety of our country."
Hosoda said any other military exports would be approved on a case-by-case
basis. Koizumi on Friday held out the possibility that Japan, which is heavily
dependent on oil shipments, could sell arms to Southeast Asian nations to fight
piracy.
Hiroshi Okuda, chairman of the country's largest commercial lobby, the Japan
Business Federation or Keidanren, hailed the new defense policy, saying Japan
was "in the midst of a major turning point."
The constitution imposed by US occupiers after World War II said Japan would
forever renounce war. Japan has since produced top-of-the-line equipment which
its military -- known as the Self-Defense Forces -- is forbidden to use.
Embracing its pacifist role, Japan in 1967 said it would ban all weapons
sales. The self-imposed ban was tightened in 1976 to rule out all military
exports.
Tokyo and Washington began to study a missile interception shield
after North Korea shocked the world in 1998 by firing a missile over Japan.
But Japan was forbidden from exporting missile components to its close ally
because it has had a defense-only security policy since its bitter defeat in
World War II.
The new defense outline comes as Japan sees increasing tension with both
North Korea and China.
Hosoda played down the symbolism of the guidelines, noting they did not
explicitly label China a threat. But he said that due to growing Chinese
military and economy strength, Japan "needs to watch China."
The guidelines said: "China, which has a great impact on security in this
region, is pushing ahead with enhancing its nuclear and missile capabilities in
modernizing its navy and air force while expanding marine activities."
Tomohide Murai, professor of Japan's state-run National Defense Academy and
specialist on East Asia security issues, said Beijing "will surely upgrade and
modernize its military" as its economy grows.
Bilateral visits have been on hold, with China voicing anger over Koizumi's
repeated visits to a Tokyo shrine dedicated to 2.5 million Japanese war dead
including seven men hanged for World War II war crimes.
The guidelines said North Korea was "developing, deploying and proliferating
weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles," describing its military
moves as serious, destabilizing factors in the region.
An advisory panel to Koizumi mapping out the defense strategies recommended
in October that Japan study acquiring the ability to launch pre-emptive strikes.
But there was no explicit reference to that point in the new outline. Murai
said it probably reflected "a lack of debate among people" as well as fear that
such a major move would cause unnecessary concern at home and abroad.
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Today's
Top News |
|
|
|
Top World
News |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|