Home>News Center>China
       
 

Ox or donkey? Tiny animal stirs art debate
By Zhao Huanxin (China Daily)
Updated: 2004-12-16 00:58

A donkey or an ox -- the question is still open -- may be at the heart of a controversy surrounding one of China's most treasured national art works.

The dilemma is whether repairs made over the centuries to a Northern Song Dynasty masterpiece simply added images that were not there. If so, should those repairs be undone or did they become part of the work?

Qingming Shanghe Tu was painted by 12th century imperial court painter Zhang Zeduan during the Northern Song Dynasty (906-1127).

Variously translated as Going Upriver for the Qingming Festival or Peace Reigns on the River, the 528.7-centimetre-long silk handscroll in ink and colours depicts a panorama of daily life, business and social interaction in Bianliang, the capital of the Northern Song Dynasty and today's Kaifeng in Henan Province.

The United States, France, Britain and Japan each has at least one copy of this Chinese masterpiece, which experts believe are just duplications.

Only the Palace Museum in Beijing possesses the original, said Yu Hui, a museum official.

But the restoration of a tiny part of the handscroll in 1973 has triggered a heated debate among academics and the public.

At the centre of the controversy is a donkey. Or is it an ox?

A former Palace Museum copier, Wang Kairu, said the restorations changed the original work.

In 1973, a panel of experts at the Palace Museum determined a small part of the painting had been inappropriately mended during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644).

According to Yu, the experts believed the Ming artists had "mistakenly" thought a pole crutch on the painting was the "horn of an ox," whose body was missing. So they pasted on a little piece of silk and painted an "ox" on it.

So the Palace Museum experts in 1973 removed that little piece of silk.

Over the past few months, however, the now absent piece of silk has fuelled a hot debate.

Yu and other experts claim the Ming addition makes the painting difficult to understand and goes against the spirit of the original work.

"The decision to remove the tiny silk piece from the painting was made after careful consideration and deliberation, with the whole process being photographed," Xu Zhongling, 67, then deputy director of the museum's calligraphy and painting division, told China Daily yesterday.

But Wang Kairu, who has studied Zhang's painting for years and made four copies of the original work in 1997, insisted the small piece of silk on Zhang's original work perfectly fits the scenario of the handscroll, and was likely made with good reason.

And that is only the beginning of the debate.

To many people's surprise, however, Wang believes that the Ming Dynasty restorers did not paint an ox on their silk patch but a donkey in heat.

"A person with knowledge of livestock will see it was a ruttish she-donkey," he said.

Putting the animal in the context of the painting, the donkey could be interpreted as moving towards a jackass nearby, scaring an old man who tries to rein it in while warning a child to avoid, Wang said.

"The Palace Museum experts seemed to not know the behaviour of animals very well, I know animals well since I grew up and live in the countryside," he said.

Ox or donkey, once it had been fixed on the ancient painting by ancient artists, it should not be simply taken away, said both Wang and Feng Jicai, a well known Chinese writer and painter.

Removing the patch made that part of the masterpiece more difficult to understand, Wang said.

He said the art work should be restored to what it was before 1973, otherwise, people throughout the world will never have a chance to see the "undeleted" painting.

But Palace Museum official Yu said removing the tiny part restored the original look of the great work.

He said the museum will sponsor an international seminar on the painting next October, when the museum will give a clear explanation of its restoration efforts.



 
  Today's Top News     Top China News
 

China to build high speed railways next year

 

   
 

New court rules to better guard IPR

 

   
 

754 officials punished for fund misuse

 

   
 

Chen's stance a "threat" to peace

 

   
 

Iraqi defence minister: Iran is "No 1 enemy"

 

   
 

Pakistan, China sign 7 deals on projects

 

   
  Costly National Theater faces financial woes
   
  Experts: Firms need IPR management aid
   
  Forex savings drop by 5.9% in November
   
  Staggered hours to save city power
   
  Hong Kong residents eye life in Guangdong
   
  China to build high speed railways next year
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  Related Stories  
   
China's third generation art and artists
   
Chinese art galleries to see "golden time"
   
Chinese art galleries to see "golden time"
   
Shanghai art lovers in for treat
   
No need to leave home to enjoy the arts
   
Arts awards join forces
   
China Arts Festival kicks off in Hangzhou
  News Talk  
  It is time to prepare for Beijing - 2008  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中午字幕在线观看| 亚洲无码在线播放| 草莓视频成人在线观看| 国产真人无遮挡作爱免费视频| ass亚洲**毛茸茸pics| 成人人观看的免费毛片| 久久亚洲精品人成综合网| 一区二区三区电影在线观看| 最近免费中文字幕中文高清| 亚洲欧洲小视频| 狠狠色丁香婷婷久久综合 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区| 色人阁在线视频| 国产精品无码素人福利| 98久久人妻无码精品系列蜜桃| 好男人网官网在线观看| 东京一本一道一二三区| 无主之花2025韩语中字| 久久国产免费福利永久| 暴力肉体进入hdxxxxx| 亚洲va欧美va国产综合| 欧美另类xxx| 亚洲最大看欧美片网站| 污污视频在线观看黄| 亚洲美国产亚洲av| 田中瞳中文字幕久久精品| 免费成人在线观看| 米兰厉云封免费阅读完结| 北条麻妃vs黑人解禁| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站| 四虎影视永久地址www成人| 色情无码www视频无码区小黄鸭| 国产午夜无码片在线观看| 顶级欧美妇高清xxxxx| 国产吃奶摸下激烈视频无遮挡| 黄色大片在线视频| 国产成人精品午夜二三区波多野| 免费观看无遮挡www的小视频| 国产男靠女免费视频网站| 亚洲欧美日韩人成| 国产日韩欧美视频二区|