March 22, 2025
    Advanced Search 
  Home>News Center>World
         
 

Agent Orange plaintiffs condemn US court
(Agencies)
Updated: 2005-03-11 15:10

Vietnamese Agent Orange victims have angrily condemned a US court's dismissal of their lawsuit accusing a string of US chemical firms of crimes against humanity and pledged to continue their legal battle.

A New York judge threw out the case, filed on behalf of millions of Vietnamese harmed by the war-era defoliant, on Thursday, saying it had no basis in law.

10-year-old Tran Binh Minhn (L) and 11-year-old Pham Thi Thuy Linh, both Agent Orange victims and handicap, learn to write with their feet at the Peace Village in Tu Du hospital in Ho Chi Minh City. Victims have angrily condemned a US court dismissal of their lawsuit against a string of US chemical firms alleging crimes against humanity. [AFP/File]
10-year-old Tran Binh Minhn (L) and 11-year-old Pham Thi Thuy Linh, both Agent Orange victims and handicap, learn to write with their feet at the Peace Village in Tu Du hospital in Ho Chi Minh City. Victims have angrily condemned a US court dismissal of their lawsuit against a string of US chemical firms alleging crimes against humanity. [AFP/File]
"It is a wrong decision, unfair and irresponsible," said Nguyen Trong Nhan, vice president of Vietnam's Association for Victims of Agent Orange (VAVA), saying the legal fight would continue.

"This is just another war that could be long and difficult, as was the Vietnam war. We are determined to pursue it until the very end, until the day we will be able to ask for justice," he told AFP.

Agent Orange was used by the US Army in the 1954-1975 Vietnam War to clear the jungle and prevent enemy forces from being able to use the dense foliage for cover.

A Vietnamese Agent Orange victim looks on at Hoa Binh (Peace) village, a hospice for Agent Orange victims in Hanoi on December 14, 2004. A federal judge on March 11 dismissed a lawsuit that accused chemical companies of committing war crimes by supplying the U.S. military with Agent Orange in the Vietnam War, saying they did not violate U.S. or international law. Picture taken on December 14, 2004. REUTERS/Kham
A Vietnamese Agent Orange victim looks on at Hoa Binh (Peace) village, a hospice for Agent Orange victims in Hanoi on December 14, 2004. Picture taken on December 14, 2004.[Reuters/file]
The lawsuit, against firms including pharmaceutical giants Monsanto, Dow Chemical and Hercules Incorporated, won mass support in Vietnam where 11.5 million people signed a petition, according to official figures.

Heart-rending pictures such as a child with a distorted face, a legless woman walking on her hands and two babies fused together in a single body have hit Vietnamese newspapers in recent weeks.

But district court judge Jack Weinstein said there was no law that could enforce the plaintiffs' claim that the firms were guilty of crimes against humanity for making Agent Orange available.

"There is no basis for any of the claims of plaintiffs under the domestic law of any nation or state or under any form of international law. The case is dismissed," the judge said.

The US-based Fund for Reconciliation and Development (FRD) said the judge's decision made it easier for the United States to "continue to evade moral responsibility for the consequences of its actions."

"Regardless of how much chemical companies and the US government knew about the poisonous dioxin... they should not hide behind legal and scientific technicalities to avoid facing their obligation...," FRD Executive Director John McAuliff said.

In theory, the decision can be appealed and then taken to the US Supreme Court.

Some Vietnamese experts believe an appeal could be possible on the legal precedent of a 1984 class action settlement, when manufacturers agreed to pay 180 million dollars to US war veterans who died or became ill after exposure to defoliants.

"If the medical files (of Vietnamese victims) are not convincing enough, we will use the ones of the American soldiers," said in Tuoi Tre newspaper Professor Ngo Thanh Nhan, who participated in the campaign to drum up support for the case.

"There's no reason why those who sprayed chemical products got compensation for their contamination... and the direct victims' suit is rejected by an American court."

Several Vietnamese papers condemned the decision.

"It is not only a legal matter. The two aspects, legal and moral, have to be examined," said Nguyen Van Tuan, an Australian scientist of Vietnamese origin, in the Tuoi Tre newspaper.

"The US are today the first world power... and they have to admit their fault... and take concrete measures to reduce the pain of millions of victims in the country."

"We wonder why the United States allow themselves to teach Vietnam lessons about human rights as they try to avoid their responsibilities...," said the People's Army mouthpiece, Quan Doi Nhan Dan.

In September, the US State Department singled out Vietnam as a "country of particular concern" over its abuse of religious freedom.



 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

Tung Chee-hwa resigns as HK chief executive

 

   
 

Steps to narrow rich-poor gap needed

 

   
 

Money talks in capturing drug suspect

 

   
 

Farming sets goals to raise productivity

 

   
 

Peninsula likely to top Rice's first visit

 

   
 

Suicide bomber kills 47 at Iraq funeral

 

   
  Gunmen break up Fatah party meeting
   
  Spain marks anniversary of March 11 train bombings
   
  Suicide bomber kills 47 at Iraq funeral
   
  Clinton resting after successful surgery
   
  Peninsula likely to top Rice's first visit
   
  14 die in helicopter crash in Chechnya
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
 
Font Large Medium Small
E-Mail This Story
Print Friendly Format
Comment On This Story
Save This Story
 
  News Talk  
  Are the Republicans exploiting the memory of 9/11?  
Advertisement
         

| Home | News | Business | Living in China | Forum | E-Papers | Weather |

| About China Daily | About China Daily.com.cn | Contact Us | Site Map | Jobs |
 Copyright 2005 Chinadaily.com.cn All rights reserved. Registered Number: 20100000002731
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美亚洲国产日韩| 蜜芽国产尤物AV尤物在线看 | 啊轻点灬大ji巴太粗太长了电影 | 在线观看91精品国产入口| 中文亚洲欧美日韩无线码 | 国产一区二区三区播放| 国产精选之刘婷野战| 国产精品无码日韩欧| 99热这里有精品| 干妞网免费视频| 中文日韩亚洲欧美制服| 日本高清在线中文字幕网| 亚洲av永久无码精品古装片| 欧美极度另类精品| 亚洲精品自产拍在线观看| 色综合久久久无码中文字幕波多| 日本一区二区三区在线观看视频 | 久久综合九色欧美综合狠狠| 欧美成人免费午夜全| 亚洲精品99久久久久中文字幕| 男性gay黄免费网站| 古代np多夫h肉辣文| 色综合久久加勒比高清88| 精品丝袜国产自在线拍亚洲| 日韩精品免费电影| 国产老妇伦国产熟女老妇高清| 一级免费黄色大片| 无码一区二区波多野结衣播放搜索 | 欧美性极品hd高清视频| 免费人成黄页在线观看视频国产| 美女大量吞精在线观看456| 国产一级特黄a大片免费| 青青青国产依人精品视频| 国产嫩草在线观看| 91香蕉视频导航| 国产成人精品久久综合| 久久综合九色综合97伊人麻豆| 国产真实乱子伦精品视手机观看| 伊人婷婷综合缴情亚洲五月 | ww美色吧com| 孕交动漫h无遮挡肉|