|
U.N. nuke conference offers no new action
(Agencies)
Updated: 2005-05-28 08:53
A monthlong conference to toughen global controls on nuclear arms ended
Friday with nothing to show for its four weeks of divisive work.
From Japan's "extreme regret" to Norway's "profound disappointment,"
delegates expressed frustration that the failure to agree on an action plan for
growing nuclear threats might weaken the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, the
pact that has helped keep a lid on doomsday weapons for 35 years.
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan believes "their inability to strengthen
their collective efforts is bound to weaken the treaty," his spokesman said.
Annan said world leaders should deal with the issues at a global summit
scheduled for September.
The failure comes at a time of heightening nuclear tensions in the world.
North Korea has pulled out of the treaty and says it is building atom bombs.
Iran's uranium-enrichment program raises questions about possible weapons plans.
Arab states view Israel's nuclear arsenal as increasingly provocative.
The conference had futilely debated proposals to address all these issues.
Many delegates also were disturbed over the Bush administration's talk of
modernizing the U.S. nuclear force, and sought U.S. reaffirmation of commitments
made to disarmament steps at the nonproliferation conferences of 1995 and 2000.
In this meeting's final hours, the U.S.-led Western group of nations blocked
any mention of those commitments in the conference's already-thin final report.
The disagreements even kept conference President Sergio de Queiroz Duarte
from issuing a statement endorsing nonproliferation principles. "It would be
very difficult for me in the face of so many divergencies," the Brazilian
diplomat told reporters.
Members of the 188-nation Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty convene only once
every five years to assess the workings of the 1970 treaty and find ways to make
it work better — political commitments that give a boost to nonproliferation
initiatives.
Under the nuclear pact, states without atomic arms pledged not to develop
them, and five with the weapons — the United States, Russia, Britain, France and
China — undertook to eventually eliminate their arsenals. The nonweapons states,
meanwhile, were guaranteed access to peaceful nuclear technology.
Citing that guarantee, Iran has obtained uranium-enrichment centrifuges,
which can produce both fuel for nuclear power plants and material for bombs. The
United States contends Iran plans to build weapons, but the Iranians say they're
interested only in peaceful energy.
Delegations had promoted ideas, for example, for limiting access to such
dual-use technology with bombmaking potential, along with proposals to
strengthen inspection of nuclear facilities and to pressure nuclear-weapons
states to shrink their arsenals more quickly.
On withdrawal from the nonproliferation pact, which North Korea managed
without consequence, some delegations supported plans to make the process more
difficult and penalty-laden.
But the dozens of proposals were stalled for more than two weeks while
delegations squabbled over the agenda. Then, when debate finally started, it
proved impossible to win consensus.
Iran objected to any mention of it as a proliferation concern. Egypt balked
at toughening treaty withdrawal, since it wants that option open as long as
ex-enemy Israel has nuclear bombs. And the United States fought every reference
to its 1995 and 2000 commitments.
Those commitments included, for example, activating the nuclear test-ban
treaty and negotiating a verifiable treaty to ban production of bomb materials —
both steps the Bush administration opposes, but other weapons states support.
In final speeches Friday, delegation after delegation, including the European
Union representative, spoke of the importance of the 1995-2000 commitments.
"If we allow agreements at one conference to be rolled back at the next, we
will undermine the very premise the multinational system is based upon," said
South Africa's Abdul Minty.
The lead U.S. delegate, Jackie Sanders, countered that the United States has
a "strong record on nuclear disarmament." She expressed only mild disappointment
at the conference outcome, instead pointing to unilateral Bush administration
initiatives to halt the spread of ultimate weapons, such as its efforts to
intercept illicit nuclear trade.
In an Associated Press interview from his Vienna headquarters, the U.N.
nuclear agency head, Mohamed ElBaradei, said of the failed conference, "It is
vital that we pick up the pieces and look forward. We have a golden opportunity
at the summit meeting in New York" in September.
As the conference closed, the U.N. spokesman's office said Annan "challenges
leaders to use that (summit) opportunity to make bold commitments and address
the pressing challenges."
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
Today's
Top News |
|
|
|
Top World
News |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
