OP Rana

GM-tech running agriculture to seed

By Op Rana (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-03-19 06:45
Large Medium Small

To eat GM food, or not to eat: that is the question in China after the Ministry of Agriculture allowed field trials with genetically modified rice seeds. The experts' world is divided.

GM seed supporters argue the world's hungry cannot be fed if agriculture doesn't change its traditional ways (read: if farmers do not use GM seeds). They say if the opponents can accept Bt cotton and genetically engineered medicine, why cannot they accept GM rice.

Let's take China and India, where Bt cotton is grown widely, as examples. GM seeds were introduced in these countries as high-yielding varieties. Very few, if any, farmers were told at the outset that they would have no choice but to keep paying exponentially more to buy them season after season. The Western world, which claims to have gifted the magic seed to the poor, is obsessed with democracy. But after using GM seeds does a farmer have the democracy of choice to revert to conventional seeds? To be honest, he has - but the soil, contaminated by GM seeds, would at best yield a poor harvest.

Thousands of farmers have committed suicide in India because their GM crops failed. They could not repay the loans they had taken from banks and/or moneylenders to buy GM seeds. The lure of GM seeds is still pushing hundreds of thousands of others under insurmountable debts. But they are not part of the West's democracy program.

Earlier this month came a confession from Monsanto, the world's biggest GM seed-maker, that pink bollworms insects had developed resistance to its Bt cotton crop in India's western province of Gujarat.

So what do the farmers do? Monsanto advocates they graduate to using its second-generation product called "Bollgard II which has greater ability (and costs more) to delay resistance". In other words, it is admitting the failure of Bt technology. So democracy means continuing to buy "higher quality" products from the same company and paying more year after year.

Suppose the farmers do buy Bollgard II, is there any guarantee that it would not fail in another few years?

But still the champions of GM seeds want to introduce Bt eggplants in India because it will increase the yield of the vegetable. They have had to back off for now because of public protests, but given India's democratic record they could always return successfully, and one cannot say whether secret trials have already been held with Bt eggplant seeds.

That brings us back to the trial of GM rice seeds in China. It's true that China was the first to grow hybrid varieties of rice. It's also true that hybrid seeds raised output and helped feed millions of more people. India used it, too, with the same results. But hybrid seeds are not, as they are touted to be, the same as GM seeds that multinationals are trying to push down farmers' throats today.

It is surprising that the main targets of GM seed companies are developing countries. Is it because people in the Western world, which engendered GM seeds, are also its greatest opponents? Why do GM seed companies find few takers in the developed world? Why is the European Union still skeptical about GM food? Why do GM companies respect democracy of choice in the developed world and not in developing countries?

Why doesn't an independent study on the harmful effects of GM seeds in China or India carry the same weight as that done by America's Pesticide Action Network (PAN)? Recently, PAN joined hundreds of farmers in Ankeny, Iowa, to "testify to the devastating effects of corporate control over food and agriculture".

PAN presented evidence "from the most comprehensive analysis of global agriculture to date, the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science & Technology", which said GM seeds and industrial-scale farming are unlikely to feed the world; GM technologies have consistently benefited corporations, not the world's hungry; and sustainable agriculture that works for people and the planet requires breaking up corporate monopolies in agriculture.

Let's accept it. GM seeds, in the control of multinational companies, are not science but pure commerce. They are not being promoted to feed the world's hungry, but to make money. These companies have spent billions of dollars to genetically modify the seeds. Now, they are forcing poor farmers to pay them back with a very high rate of interest. Whither democracy?

主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文在线观看视频| 成人男女网18免费视频| 性欧美丰满熟妇XXXX性久久久| 国产精品亚洲欧美云霸高清 | 要灬要灬再深点受不了好舒服| 法国女人与动zozoz0z0| 成熟女人特级毛片www免费| 国产精品一区二区香蕉| 人妖欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久精品国产69国产精品亚洲| 99在线观看视频免费精品9| 被男按摩师添的好爽在线直播| 99这里只精品热在线获取| 92国产精品午夜福利| 色综合天天综合中文网| 粗大挺进尤物人妻中文字幕| 日韩免费视频一区二区| 国产麻豆成人传媒免费观看| 免费观看无遮挡www的视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类在线一| 三年片在线观看免费观看大全中国| 黑人边吃奶边扎下面激情视频| 欧美激情另欧美做真爱| 天天摸天天舔天天操| 又粗又大又爽又长又紧又水| 久久久久亚洲精品成人网小说| 性一交一乱一伧老太| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区综合| 夜先锋av资源网站| 国产成人高清精品免费鸭子| 亚洲日产韩国一二三四区| 99精品众筹模特自拍视频| 福利一区二区三区视频在线观看| 性欧美video在线播放| 向日葵app在线观看下载大全视频 向日葵app在线观看下载视频免费 | 日韩精品视频在线观看免费| 国产老妇伦国产熟女老妇视频 | 天天干天天射天天操| 公洗澡时强要了| а√天堂中文最新版地址| 精品免费AV一区二区三区|