Zhu Yuan

Balance growth with social equity

By Zhu Yuan (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-06-02 07:15
Large Medium Small

Some Chinese miss the "good old days" when the wealth gap between the haves and have-nots was not as stark as it is now.

Certainly, their lives are better today, yet they hate the social inequities brought on by the seemingly laissez faire policies of the past three decades.

Some even say they would rather put up with the rationing of the past (prior to 1979) than witness the wallets of capitalists or speculators grow fatter, as wealth tilts in favor of the haves.

They, of course, are pining for an economy that was tightly reined in by the government from the early 1950s to the late 1970s.

However, they forget that the economy, to some extent, is just as controlled today as it was then.

Ludwig von Mises, the Austrian economist whose masterpiece, Human Action, was translated into Chinese and published in January this year, may shed some light on this dilemma.

His magnum opus, in German, was first published in 1940 and is still considered a classic on the market economy.

As an economist who supported the theory of classic liberalism, Mises was undoubtedly a diehard advocate of laissez faire economy and fiercely opposed the concept of a planned one.

I may not be the best judge of Mises' theories, but I do agree with his take on progress and reactionary forces.

"Reaction against an unwise policy is not to be condemned. And, progress towards chaos is not to be commended. Nothing should find acceptance just because it is new, radical, and fashionable."

This is quite similar to the "cat theory" propounded by late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping: "It doesn't matter whether a cat is white or black, as long as it catches mice."

So, on the question of a planned economy, what mattered at the time of the reform and "opening up" was whether the old model had facilitated economic development or not. The reform in 1978 was a reaction to the old policies, and it worked.

Due to the miracle brought about by the economic reform and opening up policy over the past three decades, the ordinary Chinese citizen's quality of life has improved considerably.

This has proved wrong the notion that the country's nearly 80 percent farmers were not able to feed a population of some 600 million in the 1960s and that its industry could hardly meet the people's need for daily necessities then.

To be sure, relative social justice was maintained at the cost of economic development. Uncontrolled economic activity was disallowed for fear that higher incomes in the hands of certain individuals would hurt social justice. Yet, common poverty was the result.

Now it seems the government has moved to the other extreme, which is that, everything must serve the need of economic growth.

Deng Xiaoping did say, "economic development is of the utmost importance."

Classic liberalism too strongly opposes government intervention in economic activity. However, no one has advocated economic growth at the expense of social justice.

Besides, China's economy may hardly be called laissez faire. On the contrary, government policies are behind many an economic improvement project.

Some policies promote economic development even at the cost of hurting the poor majority.

Laissez faire without regulation by the government and necessary oversight can be problematic, as evidenced by the Wall Street-led financial crisis.

This is because the pursuit of profit is fundamental to human nature, and it will undoubtedly be reckless without supervision and regulation.

We call our economy a "socialist market economy" and our system, socialism with Chinese characteristics.

We want to let the rest of the world know that we are different from traditional Western capitalist nations. There should be no problem with that.

It actually does not matter what we call our economy or social system as long as we strike a balance between maintaining economic growth and safeguarding social justice.

Mises once said that there was no way of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. It seems he had anticipated the current global financial crisis.

My understanding is that it is just too dangerous for society to let a few people become richer even as the majority tumbles into extreme poverty. That is precisely the result of expansion of credit, and that is how social justice is given the go-by.

Fortunately, the Chinese government has realized the potential danger of such a situation.

Deng Xiaoping said, some people may be allowed to get rich first, but the final goal should be prosperity for all.

This may just be the right moment to go about achieving the latter goal.

E-mail: zhuyuan@chinadaily.com.cn

主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧洲美女与动性zozozo| 色欲色香天天天综合VVV| 女班长的放荡日记高h| 亚洲av无一区二区三区| 男人扒开女人下身添免费| 国产人妖一区二区| 中文字幕在线观看| 欧美三级在线免费观看| 免费国产成人高清视频网站| 黑人巨大sv张丽在线播放| 国色天香网在线| 中文字幕一区在线观看| 最近2019年中文字幕国语大全| 午夜电影在线播放| 麻豆www传媒| 国产精品福利一区二区| 一二三区在线视频| 日本xxxwww| 亚洲va久久久噜噜噜久久天堂| 精品日韩二区三区精品视频| 国产性夜夜春夜夜爽| 4hu四虎永久地址| 好紧好爽太大了h视频| 久久久久久久影院| 极品色αv影院| 亚洲色婷婷六月亚洲婷婷6月| 高h黄全肉一女n男古风| 国产精品日本一区二区在线看| 中文字幕日本最新乱码视频| 欧美日本另类xxx乱大交| 免费足恋视频网站女王| 花季传媒app免费版网站下载安装| 国产香蕉国产精品偷在线| 一级毛片免费观看不收费| 极品艳短篇集500丝袜txt| 免费扒丝袜在线观看网站| 色八a级在线观看| 国产精品内射视频免费| avtt在线播放| 少妇大胆瓣开下部自慰| 久久综合给合久久狠狠狠97色|