Chen Weihua

Too many lawyers spoil the law

By Chen Weihua (China Daily)
Updated: 2011-02-15 07:55
Large Medium Small

It is often said that there are too many lawyers in the United States, and I have started to see that for myself after living in New York for just 16 months.

My colleague, who believed I was ripped-off by a Yellow Cab driver, suggested I should lodge a complaint. So I did, mostly out of journalistic curiosity. I submitted my case in a letter to NYC 311, the institution that handles the disputes.

A few weeks later, I got a letter asking if I was willing to attend a hearing about my case on the phone or in person. Appearing in person was said to increase the chance of success.

I said in person, again out of curiosity. However, two months have passed and I haven't heard a thing.

What is interesting is that the original NYC 311 letter stated that even if the hearing finds that I was overcharged by the cab driver, I won't receive any compensation. The penalty from the taxi firm will go into the city's coffers. If I want my money back, I have to file another suit against the taxi fleet in a civil court.

I am not sure now if I want to satisfy my curiosity by pursuing the case, given the time and cost that might be involved. It is certainly going to cost more than my fare from the airport.

Lawyers are one of the largest professional groups I have come across in New York and I am beginning to see why, as they are not only involved in my cabbie case, they are also involved with my subway card after it was swallowed and a different one of no value returned at a downtown station on Thanksgiving Day.

When I called from the station, a Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) supervisor, who could clearly see me on the surveillance camera, took down my information and said she would request a repayment for me.

After two months, I finally heard back from MTA. It was a letter saying that if I want to get my card back, I should fill in an affidavit and have it notarized before sending it to the MTA to claim compensation.

Is it really necessary to go to a notary or even write an affidavit since the surveillance camera and the fare system should have recorded all the information needed for my case? A notary service will cost more than what I had on the card.

Perhaps I am just not used to that kind of rule of law. China, after all, has only 170,000 licensed lawyers for a population of 1.3 billion. The US, on the contrary, has more than 1 million lawyers, averaging one lawyer for every 265 Americans, the highest in the world. And that does not include some 45,000 graduates turned out by law schools every year.

But clearly many lawyers are needed when every state has different laws. They are even different on the two sides of the Hudson River.

And just as there are always enough cars to fill any road space, there are always enough lawsuits to keep all the lawyers happy. China definitely needs more lawyers to build a society ruled by the law. But I am not sure if we really need lawyers to settle every daily nuisance.

As Chinese writer Lin Yutang once said: When there are too many lawyers, there can be no justice.

The author is deputy editor of China Daily US edition. He can be reached at chenweihua@chinadaily.com.cn

(China Daily 02/15/2011 page8)

分享按鈕
主站蜘蛛池模板: www.henhencao.com| 亚洲国产成人va在线观看网址| www.中文字幕.com| 日本三级在线观看免费| 亚洲午夜国产精品无码| 爽爽影院色黄网站在线观看| 另类国产ts人妖系列| 说女生二哈是什么意思| 欧美亚洲一区二区三区| 在线观看日韩电影| 东京热加勒比无码少妇| 日本熟妇色一本在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕无码专区| 欧美日韩精品久久免费| 亚洲精品福利在线观看| 男人桶女人视频不要下载| 再来一次好吗动漫免费观看| 美女毛片一区二区三区四区| 国产一级视频免费| 超兴奋的朋…中文字幕| 国产又色又爽又黄刺激在线视频| a毛片在线观看| 孕妇videos孕交| 一级毛片在线完整免费观看| 成人精品一区二区不卡视频| 中文字幕第13亚洲另类| 一级三级黄色片| 日本成人福利视频| 久艹视频在线免费观看| 欧美另类xxxxx极品| 亚洲毛片基地4455ww| 热久久国产精品| 免费国产黄网站在线观看视频| 好男人官网在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久一区二区三区| xxxxx做受大片视频免费| 成人免费视频国产| 中文字幕永久在线视频| 日产一区日产片| 久久中文骚妇内射| 日本人视频-jlzzjlzzjlzz|