USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Flaws in democratic system exposed by triumphalism

By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-04 08:41

Democracy, as Britain's wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

Even if he did not say precisely that, this is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development, but it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

The widespread sentiment within Western electorates that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the United States and United Kingdom and may play a role in future outcomes in 2017.

On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in the UK and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system-people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

Among some who voted for Brexit, on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" but only after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures demonstrate the values and benefits of different choices.

Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. harvey.morris@gmail.com

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产福利91精品一区二区| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区三区| 久久精品日日躁夜夜躁欧美| 东京加勒比中文字幕波多野结衣| 99久在线国内在线播放免费观看| 欧美jlzz18性欧美| 精品亚洲成a人在线观看| 欧美性大战久久久久久片段| 无翼日本全彩漫画大全全彩| 在线日本中文字幕| 国产人妖视频一区二区| 亚洲视频欧美视频| 九九视频精品在线| 一个看片免费视频www| 一区二区视频网| 1024手机看片基地| 美女张开腿让男人桶的动态图| 欧美真实破苞流血在线播放| 无码精品日韩中文字幕| 国产精品综合视频| 午夜男女爽爽影院网站| 亚洲av无码专区亚洲av桃| 一区二区三区免费高清视频| 国产色在线视频| 激情啪啪精品一区二区| 无码国产乱人伦偷精品视频| 国产精品嫩草影院人体模特| 北条麻妃国产九九九精品视频| 亚洲AV无码AV制服另类专区| a在线观看网站| 老子影院理论片在线观看| 樱桃视频高清免费观看在线播放| 女人体a级1963免费| 国产伦理一区二区| 亚洲国产AV无码一区二区三区 | 久久96国产精品久久久| 福利姬在线精品观看| 男人和女人做爽爽视频| 成年人视频免费在线观看| 国产成人久久精品亚洲小说| 亚洲日本va午夜中文字幕一区|