USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Niceties of old-style diplomacy still work

By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-10 08:34

Niceties of old-style diplomacy still work

Milan Bacevic, Serbian ambassador to China, experiences TCM diagnosis at "TCM Health Day For Ambassadors" in Beijing, Dec 12, 2016. [Zou Hong/China Daily]

A diplomat, as once defined by US writer Caskie Stinnett, "is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you actually look forward to the trip". Stinnett was writing in the mid-20th century, when exchanges between governments still relied on cadres of professionals based in each other's capitals and communicating with home via telegram, or dispatches hand-carried by couriers and consigned to diplomatic bags.

His definition of the diplomat's role encapsulates its essential requirements-sycophancy and duplicity.

These days, world leaders can communicate instantly with both their constituents and each other with no more effort-and frequently no more thought-than it takes to type 140 characters on their Twitter feed.

US President Donald Trump is a master of the new art and appears to follow a rule adopted from his business career that, even in diplomacy, you should aim to cut out the middleman. But the problem with instant messaging is that it offers speed at the cost of reflection, and brevity at the cost of precision. It also dispenses with that essential diplomatic tool-procrastination.

The diplomat of a previous era, called on to defuse some looming crisis engendered by an intemperate remark or gesture from one of his or her political masters, would invariably assure the host government that the embassy was "urgently seeking clarification". (Translation: "We're going to delay and obfuscate until you've forgotten all about it.")

These days, by contrast, social media gives political leaders a virtual "hot line" to abuse each other directly and very publicly without recourse to diplomatic intermediaries. Many may welcome the more direct approach spearheaded by Trump as a breath of fresh air. Like a man who has fired the White House chauffeur and grabbed the steering wheel himself, Trump careers along the information superhighway, shoving aside enemies both foreign and domestic. It must be invigorating, as long as you don't crash.

You might also argue that the direct approach to diplomacy is more honest.

In the past, the blazing confrontation between the United States and Germany over the future of the Western alliance would have been described in diplomat-speak as "full and frank exchanges". With social media at his disposal, Trump can cut through the hypocrisy by tweeting: "We have a massive trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay far less than they should on NATO & military. Very bad for US. This will change".

But despite the superficial attractions of this "tell it like it is" approach, there is still much to be said for old-style diplomacy. The niceties of diplomatic protocol can help to defuse tensions, rather than enflame them.

In its guide Protocol for the Modern Diplomat, the US State Department cautions new recruits that the informal US approach does not always go down well with other cultures. According to the guide: "Tremendous differences exist in how close people stand to socialize, how loudly they speak, and how much eye contact they maintain." And, it might have added, don't push fellow heads of state aside to get to the front of the line.

For all the stuffiness and insincerity of the diplomatic circuit, traditional diplomats probably do continue to play an essential role, even in an era of instant communications and presidential tweeting.

Diplomats alone cannot prevent conflicts, as history shows. But a temperate diplomatic approach can help calm the waters. "A soft answer turns away wrath; but grievous words stir up anger", as it says in the Christian Bible.

The essence of the profession is not, of course, to be gratuitously generous to the other side, but rather to gain advantage for one's own, if necessary by lying for one's country.

In the words of the great Chinese strategist Sun Tzu: "The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting."

The author is a senior media consultant for China Daily, Europe.

editor@mail.chinadailyuk.com

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产gay小鲜肉| 国产麻豆精品手机在线观看| 久久精品国产99国产精品亚洲 | 欧美AAAAAA级午夜福利视频| 亚洲老妈激情一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利1000在线观看| 国产一级黄色网| 高清破外女出血视频| 国产欧美日韩综合精品二区 | 日韩小视频网站| 亚洲国产精品无码久久98 | 国产成人综合久久综合| 25岁的女高中生在线观看| 在线观看免费为成年视频| √天堂中文官网8在线| 性色AV无码中文AV有码VR| 中文字幕电影在线| 日本工口里番h彩色无遮挡全彩 | 交换人生电影在线| 篠田优在线播放| 十八在线观观看免费视频| 美女的尿口无遮掩的照片| 国产jizzjizz视频免费看| 青柠直播在线观看高清播放| 国产对白在线观看| 国产97在线观看| 国产无套护士丝袜在线观看| 日本国产在线视频| 国产精品亚洲综合一区在线观看| 91精品国产人成网站| 国色天香社区在线观看免费播放 | 国产漂亮白嫩美女在线观看| 久久精品无码一区二区三区免费 | 五月婷婷婷婷婷| 朝鲜女**又多又黑毛片全免播放| 亚洲影院adc| 欧美成人18性| 亚洲国产成人精品女人久久久| 欧美日韩电影在线| 亚洲情综合五月天| 欧美性猛交xxx黑人猛交|