USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Shared bikes should also be safe bikes

By Cui Shoufeng | China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-02 06:54

Shared bikes should also be safe bikes
SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

Editor's Note: The parents of an 11-year-old boy, who was killed in a collision with a coach while riding one of Ofo's shared bikes in Shanghai in March, have sued the company and the coach driver, demanding 8.78 million yuan ($1.32 million) in compensation. They also want Ofo to replace its bike locks with smarter ones. Two experts share their views with China Daily's Cui Shoufeng. Excerpts follow:

Smarter locks cannot rule out accidents

Judging by the evidence available, the legal guardians of the 11-year-old, including his parents and school, should be primarily responsible for his death. Children of his age are deemed to have limited capacity for civil conduct and, hence, their civil actions should have the consent of or be ratified by their guardians. Besides, Chinese law prohibits children below 12 from riding bikes on public roads.

The coach driver's responsibility is comparatively less as the boy "stole" the bike by cracking the combination code to its lock and was riding on the wrong side of the road when the bus hit him.

The question then is: How much responsibility the bike-sharing company should shoulder?

The locks of many Ofo bikes are not difficult to open, because their four-digit combination code does not change after use and can be easily obtained. Perhaps that's why Ofo has been updating the old mechanical locks since March. The new, smart locks are harder to crack, but they have not yet been fitted to all Ofo bikes.

From the legal point of view, however, Ofo cannot be held responsible for the accident. And whether or not it has violated tort law should be decided by the cause of the boy's death. But if the locks of all Ofo bikes have design flaws and the boy cracked the combination code on one of them, Ofo should be held accountable.

Ofo might be exempted from blame, however, if it is established that the boy found the bike unlocked, because the violation of tort law consists of illegal acts and intentional mistakes. The company has moral and technological obligations, though, to update its products and pay compensation to the boy's parents. But accidents like this are not always foreseeable and cannot be avoided even after Ofo equips all its bikes with smarter locks.

Zhu Wei, deputy director of the Communication Law Center at China University of Political Science and Law

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 山东女人一级毛片| 永久免费AV无码网站性色AV| 国产成人涩涩涩视频在线观看免费| 99久久综合国产精品免费| 成人午夜精品视频在线观看| 久久国产色AV免费观看| 欧美a级毛欧美1级a大片 | 黄色免费一级片| 国产精品女在线观看| 99久久人妻无码精品系列蜜桃| 小猪视频免费网| 中文字字幕在线精品乱码app| 日本理论片理论免费| 亚洲午夜一区二区三区| 欧美黑人巨大白妞出浆| 伊人久久大香线| 精品国产一区二区三区免费| 国产av一区二区三区日韩| 非洲人zoxxxx另类| 国产成人亚洲欧美激情| 欧美bbbbbxxxxx| 国产精品日韩专区| 91资源在线播放| 在线观看中文字幕码2023| jjzz日本护士| 女人张开腿让男人桶个爽| 一本一本久久a久久综合精品蜜桃| 成年人视频在线免费播放| 久久99国产精品成人欧美| 日韩AV高清在线看片| 久久精品国产精品亚洲毛片| 最近最新好看的中文字幕2019| 亚洲人成网7777777国产| 欧美巨大xxxx做受中文字幕| 亚洲日韩精品无码专区加勒比| 爱情岛论坛免费视频| 人妻免费一区二区三区最新| 玩山村女娃的小屁股| 免费a在线观看| 狼色精品人妻在线视频| 人妻熟妇乱又伦精品视频|