.contact us |.about us
News > National News...
Search:
    Advertisement
Comment: No time to raise renminbi's value
( 2003-07-01 12:31) (China Daily)

In an era when everybody is scrambling for a bigger market share in the global economy, to criticize a country for its foreign exchange policy and try to pressure it into raising the value of its currency, seems, to some, to be an excuse for failing to identify what is wrong in their own backyard.


[chinadaily.com.cn]
China, with a staggering export growth and soaring foreign exchange reserves, has recently become the target of such an accusation.

As the Chinese renminbi fluctuates very narrowly around the US dollar at 8.28:1 and has gone down with the falling dollar, there is a growing chorus that the peg is unfairly helping the country gain shares in global markets and the value of the renminbi should be raised or immediately floated to let market forces decide its value.

But is the peg really unfair? No. Should the value of the renminbi be artificially raised? No. Should it be floated? Yes, but not at the moment and the timetable should be decided by China alone.

Critics of China's financial and trade policy often cite the country's export growth and trade surplus as evidence in support of this contention.

The approach is not a sound one because these figures can not reflect what the critics believe is happening.

China's powerful processing trade sector has an important role, if not a central one, in explaining why what China really earned in foreign trade is not as high as the exports and surplus figures suggest.

China earns a thin profit from processing trade, with a big part of the profits generated being taken by overseas companies that put brand marks on the final products. But all these products are being tallied as originating in China.

For countries that complain about trade deficits with China, it is very likely that their own companies, which earn handsome profits in China, are responsible for a share in the trade deficit.

The system of statistics of some of China's trading partners, due to technical reasons, includes their imports from Hong Kong as coming from the mainland, but excludes Hong Kong when counting their exports to China. This also distorts the real picture.

The US manufacturing sector often complains about the country's trade imbalance with China. In fact, China and the United States in the mid-1990s co-sponsored a team to research the trade deficit issue. The conclusion was that the deficit was greatly exaggerated due to technical reasons. But many people from the US side seem to have forgotten this conclusion or appeared to have never heard of it.

Critics should also bear in mind that while China's exports increase, China's imports also jumped dramatically, and the trade surplus shrank.

During the first five months of the year, both exports and imports were around US$150 billion, with a surplus of US$2.4 billion, or less than 1 per cent of the total foreign trade volume.

Calculations are subject to debate not just in trade statistics. It is an even more complicated issue to calculate a reasonable exchange rate because in economics, there is no universally agreed upon method for doing this.

Some US manufacturers argue the renminbi's exchange rate to the dollar is undervalued by some 40 per cent, but never explain how they arrived at this figure.

Their most frequently used evidence is China's great volume of exchange reserves.

But a close study on how these reserves were accumulated will indicate that it is not a sound basis for advocating a renminbi appreciation.

In fact, the reserves were accumulated under a distorted supply-demand system, a legacy of a rigid foreign exchange control system.

Hard currency earned by exporters still has to be sold to banks, while the demand for foreign currency is very much suppressed in a tradition that highlights the fear of wasting precious financial resources.

The need to safeguard foreign exchange reserves was reinforced during, and in the wake of, the 1997-99 Asian financial crisis, when the reserves acted like a dyke keeping the floods of financial danger away from China.

If all the domestic needs of foreign currencies were met, the reserves would be much lower today.

Many economists agree that the most effective standard for the "correct" exchange rate of a currency is whether the country feels comfortable with it, which means whether it promotes sound economic growth, a reasonable international balance of payments and a favourable employment level.

China feels comfortable with its current exchange rate and it should be so maintained in the near future. And China has the right to decide its exchange rate policy and no international agreement forbids that.

Nevertheless, China, in pursuit of a more mature market economy, has said its goal is to have a more flexible exchange administration system and eventually to float the renminbi to let market forces decide its value.

But it should be a gradual process. Things could be done in the process that include allowing exporters to retain an increasing part of foreign currency earnings, relaxing the control on foreign exchange demand and letting the renminbi float in a bigger range than its current level.

But neither Chinese banks nor enterprises have yet developed the necessary capability to deal with a more flexible exchange rate system.

So the timing, at the moment, is certainly not right for making major changes.

And it is even more unreasonable to artificially raise the renminbi's exchange rate before market forces have more influence over its value.

A healthy Chinese economy is a boon for the world because it generates great demand.

A premature change of the exchange rate at the moment is very likely to bring financial shocks and harm the economy.

Is a troubled Chinese economy a desirable thing? Just ask Boeing, Honda or Nokia.

   
Close  
   
  Today's Top News   Top National News
   
+Comment: No time to raise renminbi's value
( 2003-07-01)
+Six students drowned after boat sinks in South China
( 2003-07-01)
+A hard-won victory by nation and its people
( 2003-07-01)
+Wen lauds HK's victory over SARS
( 2003-07-01)
+New regulation to remove monopolies
( 2003-07-01)
+Premier Wen ends HK visit
( 2003-07-01)
+Weddings a logistical nightmare for China's transients
( 2003-07-01)
+North China city to build large-scale ski hill
( 2003-07-01)
+FM: Promotion of China-EU ties good for both sides, world
( 2003-07-01)
+UNDP helps unemployed workers in central China
( 2003-07-01)
   
  Go to Another Section  
     
 
 
     
  Article Tools  
     
  E-Mail This Article
Print Friendly Format
 
     
  Related Articles  
     
 

+Central bank to maintain renminbi interest rate
2003-06-24

 
     
   
        .contact us |.about us
  Copyright By chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved  
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品国产综合区久久久久久 | 色综合久久久无码中文字幕波多| 亚洲一卡2卡4卡5卡6卡在线99| 激情网站在线观看| 午夜dj在线观看免费高清在线| 野花社区视频在线观看| 国产日韩精品中文字无码| 亚洲午夜在线一区| 狠狠色伊人亚洲综合网站色| 午夜福利视频合集1000| 色网站免费观看| 国产午夜精品1区2区3福利| 免费足恋视频网站女王| 国产精品免费αv视频| 91精品国产肉丝高跟在线| 天啪天天久久天天综合啪| √新版天堂资源在线资源| 成人欧美一区二区三区在线| 久久99精品国产麻豆婷婷| 日本系列1页亚洲系列| 久久综合狠狠色综合伊人| 杨乃武与小白菜港版在线| 亚洲国产模特在线播放| 欧美激情一欧美吧| 亚洲欧美色图小说| 没带罩子让他c一节课| 亚洲视频在线观看网址| 疯狂吃奶freesex| 免费大片av手机看片| 精品久久久久久中文字幕无碍| 啊灬啊别停灬用力啊岳| 老湿机香蕉久久久久久| 国产av人人夜夜澡人人爽麻豆| 色欲香天天天综合网站| 国产一级二级在线| 老熟妇高潮一区二区三区| 四虎永久免费地址ww484e5566| 色先锋资源久久综合5566| 国产精品露脸国语对白| 99r在线播放| 国自产精品手机在线视频香蕉|