US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Legal perspective of Great Wall death

By Xie Caifeng (China Daily) Updated: 2015-04-13 07:47

Legal perspective of Great Wall death

A section of the Great Wall at Badaling in the suburbs of Beijing was one of the most crowded scenic spots in China during the National Day holiday. [Photo/China Daily]

Last week, a 70-year-old Chinese woman from Heilongjiang province died on the Great Wall after she was knocked down by a tourist from Canada, who reportedly was running quickly down some steps.

Does this constitute a crime? The answer varies. The district police governing the place where the incident happened concluded it was a pure "accident" after their investigation. Therefore, the police did not launch a criminal investigation but guided the woman's family and the Canadian woman into civil mediation.

However, many Chinese netizens suspect the police providing favorable treatment to the tourist because of her nationality. Frankly, it is a common mindset among some Chinese because the government offered favorable treatment to foreign enterprises and citizens during the early years of opening-up.

And several legal experts have argued that running down the steps constitutes negligent homicide according to Chinese criminal law, as it is an action that puts others at risk.

The crime of negligent homicide in China consists of four aspects, namely an action results in death, the act itself, the causal relationship between the action and the death, the action was committed because of gross negligence. The last element usually is the most decisive one. It assumes a person has a duty not to engage in an action that may foreseeable be of danger to others.

It is hard to give a firm conclusion based on the reported facts and details. But the reasonable assumption is that a running person may bump into others and hurt them, but not kill them.

There are two common ways to settle a civil dispute, amicable mediation or court judgment. In either case, the Canadian woman should provide monetary compensation to the injured party either in the spirit of equitable liability principle or fault liability principle according to Chinese law. The total sum is usually hundreds of thousands of yuan subject to the merits of each case. If two parties cannot reach a consensus on compensation, the injured party may file a case with a court.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产在热线精品视频国产一二| 无码人妻熟妇av又粗又大| 伊人久久久大香线蕉综合直播| 色噜噜视频影院| 国产成人涩涩涩视频在线观看免费| 92国产精品午夜福利免费| 女人高潮被爽到呻吟在线观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲| 欧美同性videos视频| 亚洲理论精品午夜电影| 男人都懂的网址在线看片| 日韩av高清在线看片| 免费1夜情网站| 综合五月天婷婷丁香| 国产三级精品三级| 黄网站在线播放| 国产日韩精品欧美一区喷水| 在线看片你懂的| 国产青草视频免费观看97| 99在线在线视频免费视频观看| 女人国产香蕉久久精品| 丁香色欲久久久久久综合网| 我把小yi子cao了小说| 久久久久久久久久福利| 日本电影一区二区三区| 久久精品亚洲一区二区三区浴池 | 国产精品久久久久9999赢消| 91大神在线精品视频一区| 大胸年轻的女教师5中字| www.com欧美| 好男人社区神马www在线影视| 中文字幕不卡一区| 放荡白丝袜麻麻| 中文字幕精品无码亚洲字| 日本bbwbbwbbw| 久久久噜噜噜久久熟女AA片| 日本肉体裸交xxxxbbbb| 久久大香伊蕉在人线国产h| 日韩三级电影院| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁2014| 日韩在线一区二区三区免费视频|