US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Time to break free of protectionist shackles

By Mei Xinyu (China Daily) Updated: 2016-05-25 07:45

Time to break free of protectionist shackles

An employee welds the exterior of a vehicle along a production line at a factory in Qingdao, Shandong province. [Photo/Agencies]

The overwhelming-majority vote in the European Parliament recently against granting China market economy status was not made on a reasonable basis and doing so will not bring benefits to the European Union.

Whether or not to give China the market economy status treatment is not an issue concerning whether China has met market economic standards unilaterally set by the EU, but an issue concerning whether the EU honors its commitment or not.

According to the accession articles China signed on entry to the World Trade Organization 15 years ago, China should be automatically granted market economy status in December this year. Such an article is unconditional and means that WTO members should abandon the surrogate country approach used in the past for anti-dumping investigations against China. Any investigation should instead be based on product prices or production costs in China itself.

Aside from the long-term negative effects produced by the protectionist effort to avoid industrial competition, the European Parliament's refusal to grant China market economy treatment will not have favorable short-term effects on the bloc's industrial development. In a passed resolution, the European Parliament pointed out that 56 of the anti-dumping measures the EU is taking are targeted at imports from China, covering both traditional labor-intensive manufacturing and such capital and technology-intensive manufacturing as steel products. It is exactly such an announcement that has made protectionists in the EU lobby for not granting China market economy status so that they can say "no" to "made in China" brands as a means of job protection.

Some in the EU should know that while exporting products to the rest of the world, China is also the world's leading market for imports and its growth in imports is among the fastest of world's major economies either in trade in goods or in trade in services. China's import volume denominated in the US dollar suffered a 14.1 percent decline year-on-year in 2015, bigger than the 13.4 percent decline in the import volume of the EU, but this was mainly a result of the drastic drop in prices of the primary commodities China heavily imports. China's imports of manufactured goods from the United States and European countries still enjoy huge potential for growth.

Following the European Parliament's recommendation will do no good to the struggling EU economy, given that encouraging trade protectionism will do nothing but worsen the EU's industrial environment. There were some countries in the past that did succeed in realizing the development of some infant industries through protectionist industrial policies. However, what the European Parliament's resolution tried to protect is not high-tech pioneering sectors, but such traditional sectors as steel that have already experienced their golden period and now enjoy no development potential. Interest groups dominating these out-of-date and weakly-founded industries do not focus their attention on how to raise their efficiency, but instead think how to maintain previous protectionist measures to lengthen their survival. Such attempts offer no hope for the future of EU industry and on the contrary add to its cost burden. What the EU should do is to inject new vitality into its economy.

The protectionism of interest groups has shackled the EU's economic vitality. It is exactly trade protectionism that has put the eurozone economy at a disadvantageous position in its competition with other developed economies, and caused the continuous decline of its economic proportion in the world's total GDP. Of the EU members, the countries advocating liberal trade such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Belgium, support granting China market economy status and they have also achieved a better economic performance than the eurozone as a whole. France, Italy and Spain who are opposed to granting China market economy status, however, have performed worse than the eurozone's average performance

Europe should know that the development and buildup of interest groups, a byproduct of a country or region's economic prosperity, will suffocate the vigor of its innovation and continuous growth, and only by smashing the shackles imposed by these groups can it achieve sustainable development.

The author is a researcher at the Ministry of Commerce's International Trade and Economic Cooperation Institute.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 四虎永久网址在线观看| 在线观看国产情趣免费视频| 亚洲av永久精品爱情岛论坛| 狠狠综合久久久久尤物丿| 四虎在线成人免费网站| 麻豆精产国品一二三产品区| 国产精品午夜国产小视频| AV片在线观看免费| 性xxxxx大片免费视频| 久久久国产精品| 欧美A级毛欧美1级a大片免费播放| 亚洲第一黄色网| 男同免费videos欧美| 午夜成人无码福利免费视频| 色噜噜亚洲精品中文字幕| 国产噜噜在线视频观看| 欧美激情videossex护士| 国产精品国产精品国产专区不卡| 97成人碰碰久久人人超级碰OO | 成人欧美一区二区三区的电影| 久久午夜电影网| 黄色三级电影网址| 好男人在线社区www在线观看视频| 女人战争之肮脏的交易| 中文字幕黄色片| 日干夜干天天干| 久久久久久曰本av免费免费| 日本高清com| 久久精品国产免费一区| 最新版天堂资源8网| 亚洲AV无码不卡| 杨晨晨脱得一二净无内裤全身| 亚洲中文无码a∨在线观看| 欧美午夜艳片欧美精品| 亚洲性无码av在线| 欧美怡红院免费全部视频| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区花野真一 | 日韩精品一区二区三区在线观看l| 亚洲AV无码专区国产乱码电影| 欧美性生活网址| 亚洲国产亚洲片在线观看播放|