Make me your Homepage
left corner left corner
China Daily Website

US judge OKs suit vs NCAA

Updated: 2013-11-11 08:11
By Reuters in San Francisco ( China Daily)

A lawsuit brought by college athletes seeking television and videogame revenue can move forward, a US judge has ruled, in a case that seeks to reshape traditional notions of sports amateurism in the United States.

In a decision on Friday, US District Judge Claudia Wilken in Oakland, California, ruled that a group of players could sue the National Collegiate Athletic Association as a class action, in an effort to change rules that bar athletes from earning money on their images. However, she ruled athletes could not seek money damages for financial losses they suffered in the past.

The lawsuit takes on the highly-lucrative business of college athletics, where universities reap billions of dollars from men's American football and basketball, but players are not allowed to profit.

Filed in 2009, the case seeks to create a new system where broadcasting and videogame revenue would go into a fund. Players would not get a cut of it while they were actively playing, but they would get money after they were no longer NCAA-eligible, said Sathya Gosselin, an attorney for the athletes.

"The NCAA has long decried this litigation as threatening college sports as we know it, when in fact the relief sought here is narrow," Gosselin said.

NCAA chief legal officer Don Remy said the NCAA was pleased Wilken removed damages from the case.

"We have long maintained that the plaintiffs in this matter are wrong on the facts and wrong on the law," Remy said in an e-mail. "This ruling is one step closer to validating that position."

More than 20 current and former athletes sued the NCAA, alleging that it violated federal antitrust law by conspiring with videogame maker Electronic Arts Inc and the NCAA's licensing arm to restrain competition in the market for the commercial use of the players' names, images and likenesses.

The athletes also had originally sued EA, which recently settled.

The NCAA had argued the lawsuit should not be certified as a class action because some stars would earn much more than other athletes, thus setting up a conflict of interest.

(China Daily 11/11/2013 page23)

8.03K
 
Hot Topics
...
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕日本一区| 亚洲男人的天堂网站| 91久久精品国产91久久性色tv| 日日躁夜夜躁狠狠躁超碰97| 婷婷啪啪婷婷啪啪| 亚洲天堂电影网| 爽爽影院色黄网站在线观看| 又色又爽又黄的视频软件app| 欧美另类videovideosex| 国产精品麻豆高清在线观看| a级国产乱理伦片在线播放| 巨大一下一寸挤进校花| 中文字幕乱码无线码在线| 日本丰满www色| 亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区| 男人好大好硬好爽免费视频| 十六一下岁女子毛片免费| 香蕉久久夜色精品国产| 国产精品综合一区二区三区| 9一14yosexyhd| 好妈妈5高清中字在线观看神马| 久久久久夜夜夜精品国产| 日韩精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲毛片无码专区亚洲乱| 狼群社区视频免费下载观看| 全免费一级毛片在线播放| 美国式禁忌三人伦| 啦啦啦中文在线观看日本| 色噜噜的亚洲男人的天堂| 国产乱偷国产偷高清| 视频一区视频二区制服丝袜| 国产区在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩国产vr在线观| 国产精品午夜无码av体验区| 13一14周岁毛片免费| 国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 538在线视频二三区视视频| 国产色视频一区二区三区QQ号| selaoban在线视频免费精品| 女皇跪趴受辱娇躯| ts20p1hellokittyshoes|